This past Friday the Department of Labor Published the Employment Situation Report, or Jobs Report, at 8:30 AM. It was spot analyzed until approximately 9 AM. Reporters reported on the report, not the data that was published with the report. This column has produced a number of articles regarding the data in the Jobs Report:
This column has published a number of articles on how this economy has impacted men and women. The first such article was published during November of 2014 with the article "War on Women: Men Lost 744,000 Full-time Jobs during November." This past September this column updated that information with "Obamanomics - The Battle of the Sexes - Who Has Had a Better Recovery?" This column was the article that re-introduced the "War on (Wo)men" topic to this column on a regular basis. October saw the release of the article "Fewer Men Working Full-time than July 2007." November's article "Female Workers Winning the Jobs Battle" detailed how while women have added part-time and full-time jobs since the peak of the jobs market during July 2007, Men had lost full-time jobs and added part-time jobs. A similar picture was pained with the review of the November data in the December column "1.1 Million Fewer Men working Full-time Jobs than July 2007."
It should come as no surprise that during a month while we saw full-time jobs losses, part-time job losses, and the decrease in the number of multiple jobholders, plus a spike in unemployment, that we saw men and women impacted by these changes. What happened during the month of December?
Men Have Fewer Full-time Jobs Now than they Had during July 2007, July 2016. If this recovery is as good as it is being promoted in the press a reasonable person would anticipate that there would be a growing number of men working in the workforce, and that because full-time jobs are the majority of the jobs in the United States that they would be working more full-time jobs. This is not the case. Men have 1.4 million fewer full-time jobs and 2.8 million more part-time jobs than they had during July 2007. This is an incomplete recovery.They lost over ten million full-time jobs at the depth of the recession. They broke even this past Summer. We have seen men lose over 1.3 million full-time jobs since this Summer.
Women Experienced Less Job Loss, More Job Creation Since July 2007. This topic has not been breached often, or at all, in the mainstream media. Women saw a net loss of 3.849 million jobs from July 2007 through February of 2010. You may notice that the "Jobs Iceberg" for women is slightly different from the Men's "Job Iceberg" There were some times where women gain full-time jobs and lost part-time jobs during the Summer of 2008. The Jobs Recession began during 2008 for men and included Full-time job losses and part-time job gains. Men never saw a 1:1 exchange of part-time jobs for full-time jobs. Women have gained full-time jobs and part-time jobs since July 2007, in stark contrast to their male counterparts
More Men are Officially Unemployed now than July 2007, Fewer Women. You will notice in the unemployment graph that the unemployment level for men peaked prior to when the women say their peak unemployment level, You will also note that there have "never" been fewer unemployed male workers, since the recession, than were unemployed during July 2007. There are officially 640,000 unemployed women than were present during July 2007 while there are 439,000 more men officially unemployed than were unemployed during July 2007. The official unemployment number is being skewed by the current participation rate. If someone is not employed or unemployed they are not participating in the economy. If they are not participating could they be unemployed without benefits or recognition?
Participation is Lower Now for Men than December 2014, Higher than December 2015. The general trend has been downward. Men saw the highest. This should not be a surprise. The male workforce population is growing faster than the number of jobs. What is surprising is that women are seeing a lower participation rate than 2015 and higher participation rate than 2014. Net-Net participation is down for men and women even though women are adding more jobs than men.
Are we really at full-employment for Men and for Women? Men and women were participating at higher rates prior to the recession. If we looked at changes in participation and unemployment for men and women the data for men would indicate that we have a 5.33% unemployment rate, NSA, right now. This is comparable to the office NSA unemployment rate during December 2007. The participation rate was 72.81% then compared to 68.76% right now. The "Four Presidents Column" has detailed how this difference in participation has a dramatic impact on the unemployment rate. The effective unemployment rate based on the participation rate of December 2008, is closer to 10% than it is to 5%.If we used the participation rate from December 2007 that effective unemployment rate would rise to 10.33%.
The Official Unemployment Rate for women is 4.30%. A similar argument could be made for the official unemployment rate fr women.The difference between the participation rate during December 2007 and December 2008 do not make as much of a difference as it did for men. The effective unemployment rate for women exceeds 8%.
Men and Women are suffering from a lack of participation. Full-time jobs have been created at a much slower pace than workers. Women have recovered from this recession - Men, notsomuch.
It's the economy.
unity Copyright © Jack Dunn All rights reserved.